Monday, October 15, 2012

What do I have to do?


Mark 10:17-31

As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up and knelt before him, and asked him, "Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone. You know the commandments: 'You shall not murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; You shall not defraud; Honor your father and mother.'" He said to him, "Teacher, I have kept all these since my youth." Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.

Then Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, "How hard it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!" And the disciples were perplexed at these words. But Jesus said to them again, "Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God." They were greatly astounded and said to one another, "Then who can be saved?" Jesus looked at them and said, "For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for God all things are possible." 

Peter began to say to him, "Look, we have left everything and followed you." Jesus said, "Truly I tell you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields, for my sake and for the sake of the good news, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this age—houses, brothers and sisters, mothers and children, and fields, with persecutions—and in the age to come eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last will be first."  

I doubt many of us would consider ourselves wealthy; perhaps comfortable, but wealthy?  But, if you have a bank account with even a few dollars in it, you are among the wealthiest people in the world.   But, what does it mean to be wealthy?  Well, that depends on how you think about wealth.  Does it mean how much money you make, how much property you own?  Is it your ability to provide for all your needs and still have stuff left over?

I found a list online[1]  of the average yearly income of individuals around the world broken down by countries.  Of  the 214 countries listed, the countries from 183 down have an average yearly income of less than $350, that’s 31 countries.  From 152 to 182, 30 countries, the average is less than $2000.  From 114 to 152, the average is less than $5000.  So, 100 countries have an average yearly income of less than $5000.  From 83 to 114 the average is less than $10000.  The average income of the top 50 countries finally brings you in above $20000.  The top 10 countries average in near or above $50000.   If you add up the average of the top 10 countries ($580,600) it’s the equivalent of the bottom 114 countries.  In case you are curious, the United States falls in at number 10 with an average per capita yearly income of $48,800.

As all of us are far too aware, it’s an election year.  Time after time, it seems as if the primary question politicians ask us has to do with our wealth.  Are you better off now than you were four years ago?  There are so many things that the government can focus on, that they could be concerned with.  And yet, so much of the time the focus is on money.  The politicians like to look into your eye, grab you by your greedy little boots and make you think first and foremost about yourself.  Perhaps, in the light of this morning’s text and the teachings of Jesus the better question would be, “Is your neighbor better off than they were four years ago, and what have you done to better their situations?”

The text we heard is common, we've all heard it before, and it’s one of those texts that make us squirm in our seats.  Individually, when we compare ourselves to our neighbors we might think of ourselves as being better or worse off, but in comparison with just about every country around the world the poor here are among the richest, which makes all of us here among the wealthiest in the world.  And we all remember what Jesus said, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God."  No wonder the disciples exclaimed, “then who can be saved?”

In ancient times (and in our time) financial blessings were seen as being a confirmation of the blessings from the divine.  We heard from Job this morning, at the beginning of his trials, at the end, after all the death and disease, poverty and exclusion we read, “The Lord blessed the latter days of Job more than his beginning; and he had fourteen thousand sheep, six thousand camels, a thousand yoke of oxen, and a thousand donkeys. ”  There it is, right there in the Bible, we see material and financial comfort being synonymous with God’s blessings.  No wonder the rich young man didn't consider his wealth as that which was holding him back; no wonder the disciples were so surprised by Jesus’ words.  His wealth was a sign of God’s blessings, at least it was in his eyes.

He had lived a blessed life.  He was without a doubt a person of great faith.  He had lived his life in a way that was in accordance with the law of Moses.  He had done everything in his power to ensure his place in paradise, everything in his power to inherit eternal life.  Yet, even though he had done so much, he still felt unsure of his final destination.  So, he comes with his question.  “What must I do to inherit eternal life?”  It’s a question that I’m sure many of us have uttered, or something very close to something we have felt.  Really, it’s not a question that you ask unless you have faith of some kind.  That’s why Jesus looked at him and loved him.  In fact, this is the only person in Mark’s gospel that Jesus loved.  The young man’s faith is deep, he’s made sacrifices in the way he lives his life, seeking to follow the way of God, his faith is his guide.  Jesus loves him.  And based on the way he addressed Jesus, and came seeking his wisdom and guidance, the man loved Jesus as well.

Yet, there is something missing, and he can sense it.  Jesus answers his question, “You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me."  Based on the young man’s response, that probably wasn’t the answer he was looking for.  We could even ask if he really wanted an answer, maybe he just wanted to hear confirmation from Jesus about how he had succeeded all expectations and had inherited eternal life.  Regardless, the young man hears Jesus’ answer and walks away grieving.  Was he grieving because he knew he could never do what Jesus asked?  Was he grieving because he was going to do what Jesus asked and he was overwrought with emotion?  Had Jesus’ answer closed in like a heat-seeking missile on how it was the young man defined himself?

How do we define ourselves?  Is it our possessions?  Our relationships?  Our job?  How did the young man in our text define himself?  - his possessions?  Is Jesus challenging him and us to release ourselves from the ways in which we define ourselves?  That those things don’t really matter, and that clinging to those definitions limits our ability to allow God in and transform us into the person we were created to be?  For the young man, it appears he defined himself by the things he had accomplished, the things he had done, the possessions he had, the land he owned, the amount of money in his bank account.  Jesus looks at him, loves him, and challenges him to redefine himself – it’s not about what he has, or what he has done.  Gaining eternal life is never about anything that we can do, faith and its rewards are never about anything we do.

Jesus tells the young man to let go, don’t cling to the things you think are important, don’t trust in the things you have done,  don’t focus on what you do.  If we focus on our actions, on what we do, entering the Kingdom of God is impossible (a camel through the eye of a needle) but if we focus on God’s grace, and God’s actions then anything is possible.  Entering the Kingdom isn’t about us doing, it’s about God having done. 

What must we do to inherit eternal life? We must let go of all that we have and all that we do that gets in the way of seeing that there is nothing we can do to save ourselves. Even then, letting go of it all is beyond our capacity. The hardest news Jesus has is the best news we could get -- our salvation is impossible for us to work out "But not for God; for God all things are possible."

Discipleship, following Jesus, isn’t like getting into a pool step by step, inch by inch, until you are finally in the water (on your terms), it’s about letting go completely and jumping in, committing totally to getting wet, rather than trying to keep your hair dry.  Following Jesus isn’t about trying to make the needle bigger, or the camel smaller so that things get easier.  It’s about trusting in God to make the impossible possible.  It’s about focusing less on ourselves and more on our neighbors.  It’s about remembering that God is God, and we are not.  It’s not about the size of our bank account, the number of successes we have, the ‘blessings’ we have received.  It’s about not focusing on what we think we can do to get into the Kingdom of Heaven, it’s about doing all we can to transform the world we live in into the Kingdom of God.  It’s not about us doing anything to earn or receive eternal life, it’s about giving everything up to God.  And, giving things up completely to God is what grace is all about.  Amen.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Love the sinner, hate the sin


It’s a phrase that you hear a lot in the church, especially in regard to those who are attracted to individuals of the same gender, those the public refers to as homosexuals.  It’s thrown out without a whole lot of thought, and I wonder if people really think about it.  Is it a phrase that can be used within a faith community, especially a Christian one, and remain true?  Is it biblical?

First, I think it’s important to note that the phrase never occurs in the Bible.  There are similar verses that can be teased out and interpreted in such a way that they potentially have that understanding.  However, the phrase itself comes from Gandhi’s 1929 autobiography.  I find it fascinating that so many Christians have adopted the words of a Hindu as biblical truth – truly the Spirit moves in amazing ways!

Many people over the years have attempted to address this phrase, and I do not know if adding to the wise and learned words of others will do anything other than muddy the waters; but after hearing the phrase again over the weekend, I feel I need to respond.

What does it mean to love?  In ancient Greek there are four forms of love, each with their own distinct meanings:  Eros – that’s romantic love.  Philia – that’s the love friends have for one another.  Storge – that’s the love that exists within a family: parent to child, sibling to sibling, etc.  Agape – unconditional love (God’s love).  Whenever we speak about love (or its opposite) we must be aware of the type of love we are speaking of.  Obviously when I say to my best friend, “I love you, man”  it means something different than when I say, “I love you” to my spouse.

The Bible has lots of things to say about love.  “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might.” (Deut 6:5)  “He loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of the steadfast love of the Lord.” (Psalm 33:5)  “The steadfast love of the Lord never ceases, his mercies never come to an end;” (Lament. 3:22)  “For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.” (John 3:16)  “If I speak in the tongues of mortals and of angels, but do not have love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.” (1 Cor. 13:1)  “Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God; everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, for God is love.” (1 Jn 4:7,8)

The Bible also has some things to say about hate.  “Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord? And do I not loathe those who rise up against you?  I hate them with perfect hatred; I count them my enemies.” (Psalm 139: 21,22)  “You have heard that it was said, "You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you”  (Matt 5:43,44)  “Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple.”  (Luke 14:26)

So, what is hate?  Hate is defined by Webster’s Dictionary as “a: Intense hostility and aversion usually deriving from fear, anger, or sense of injury; b : extreme dislike or antipathy”  That’s a rather basic definition, which is the way most dictionaries define words.  But, we all know that there are lots of variations when it comes to hate.  The hate we announce as children for brussel sprouts, the hate we claim for paying taxes, the hate we have for those who abuse children are all similar but not identical.  The hate the Bible speaks of when hating enemies and hating our parents cannot be the same, can it?

Here’s the thing.  Hebrew (and many ancient languages) does not have within itself the ability to express “more than” or “less than”.  So, when presenting two or more things that are in opposition to one another it must do so in complete opposition rather than in a gradient.  So, in English you can say, “I like the Vikings more than the Cowboys”, but in Hebrew you would have to say, “I love the Vikings, I hate the Cowboys.”  Wow, what a difference!  So, in that context when Jesus is talking about hating parents and siblings, he’s really saying that you can’t put following Jesus as being less important than our other relationships – not that we have to hate our parents in order to follow him.   I mean, how would we understand Jesus’ words on the cross to John, “Here is your mother” if that were the case?

So, love the sinner, hate the sin.  How would we understand that phrase differently if we were to understand from a Hebraic perspective (recognizing of course that it was not spoken in Hebrew)?  Love the sinner more than you love their sin.  All of a sudden in that context it comes to have this feeling that our love is supposed to be greater than any sin of the other.  Love > Sin.

And isn’t that the message of the Bible?